[x]

deviantART

 
:iconpoprostubono:

~PoProstuBono

Zerwij kajdany, połam bat!
About Me Member Software Developer PoProstuBonoMale/Poland Recent Activity Deviant for 2 Years
Needs Premium Membership
Statistics 83 Deviations
14 Comments
3,265 Pageviews

Eariler election; Dogma in media

Fri Jul 20, 2007, 1:13 PM
  • Mood: On Strike
  • Listening to: Lao Che - 1939/Przed Burzą
  • Reading: Lewy Czerwcowy
  • Watching: -
  • Playing: -
  • Eating: Pizza
  • Drinking: Muszynianka
I don't like to watch Polish TV news. Only what I see in TV news are boring relations dictated by medial mainstream... But there is moment, when I enjoy watching TV cheff. When? Of course when media are disorientated, because they cannot understand, what the "enemy" is doing or how to take him. They are suffering because today malice may became an approval in future. Usually disorientation time is short, i.e compare spontaneous news in TVN 24 (tfu tfu), and their compilation in "Fakty" from TVN (tfu tfu tfu). Hard politic commiser hand is affectable. There are some longer disorientations, i.e. After Polish success in Brussels, media cannot set the one version. One media criticised PiS (Law and Justice) because it was to soft, another because it was to hard... At last they made consensu - "No success in Brussels"... An other example of our media corruption was visible when Kaczyński discarded Lepper from goverment. Fotoreporters nervously reflected: "Is it good or not? Lepper is bad, so it is good. But Kaczyński is bad and strong! So it is bad. Wait, oh, we said in last news that Kaczyński is bad because he get involved with Lepper. Brr, how to solve it?" Media kettle boiled. Only next day they released news: "Lepper is good, he is a victim of CBA (?Central Anticorruption Office?) operation". But previously, after Begger's Tapes, they said that Lepper "is good"

The rule of not finding any good intentions in Kaczyńscy activity exist in whole Michnik's journalism and commercial media. Why? Because they are in hands of post-communists, like Michnik or Michalski. PiS idea of lustration, getting rid of corruption and communists cannot be accepted by media. Media are promoting opposition (Aleksander Kwaśniewski block - SLD, PO, PSL, SO, III-CorruptionIsFun-RP adherents) and showing only their pros and goverment cons. This is an big-scale affair to get PiS out of goverment. Well if you want to know oppositions real face, stay a while and read...

SLD (Alliance of Democratic Left?)- PostPZPR (communist party, which made Poland that, what it is...) representative of postsoviet financial oligarchy. Party that have strong connections with Moscov and postsoviet lobby controling the region. They simulate left wing party. The best option for Poland is to have SLD replaced by independence left wing party.

PSL (Polish Poeple Political Party?) - PostZSL (other PRL party), party of enfranchised cuntrified nomenclature. Simulating peasants farm, destroyed in the past by them. The best option for Poland is to have PSL replaced by independence party...

PO (Civic Platform?)-lobby of next to PZPR soviet model of changes beneficiary. Party controled by apparatus of former KLD, earlier one of UW wings. Younger, lively wing which have less scruples in deriving profits from post-soviet capitalism. Besides, some respectable people without influence. This irresponsible party simulates liberal party. If PO will won elections, they will immediatly forget about liberalism in the name of postcommunism. The best option for Poland is to have PO replaced by anticommunist liberal party.

SO (Samoobrona, self defence) - postPGR. Representative of medium leveled peasant nomenclature, harmed in result of dept-trap from the 90's. Searching friends in many directions: Moscov, postPZPR, and recently PiS and LPR. Simulating party of whole harmed. The best option for Poland is to have this party replaced by real representative of harmed by III RP.

LPR - PostONR + polluted by colaboration with PRL Giertych's tradition. They have some connections with postcommunists (WBG (Buissness Bank of Greater Poland ?) affair). Employment dominated by youngsters from national formations created in 90's. The best way for Poland is to have LPR replaced by non-ortodoxal party.

Radio Maryja - postPAX - not party at all, Rydzyk's Imperium. Influential. Representative of lybbys which were under PRL (Poland from 1945-89, butr officially named in 52) concession - PAX, UChS, ChSS and PZKS (These lobbys were usually omitted in the time of nomenclature enfranchisement, because of alliance with PZPR and UD/UW). Strengthened by a number of nationalists. The best option for Poland is to have no posPAXes on politcal scene and in media.


Yeah.. I gathered these informations from some historical books. This is opposition of PiS. Post-communists, liars and thiefs. I think PO will won elections in November. Why? There are some reasons... First: Most of people listen TV and "GW" without analysing informations, and vote the promoted party (PO). They say their "opinion" to their friends and so on... Second: Most of people don't care about communists. They'll vote the best-looking party (PO/SLD). Third: There are many people whose have connection with communists or "like bribes" (i.e. Doctors (even when my grandmother was dying, Doctor wanted extra cash...!). Kaczyński proceeded with stopping corrpution and we can see doctors opinion in TV) ). Fourth: Some people don't care about homeland, they are preparing to leave from Poland. Heh... power of media is incredible... My friend don't know what SLD and PO is, but he know that PiS is bad! Kaczyński with belly! He's fool... There are many half-intelligents unaware of the truth voting on PO because in TV fotoreporters are saying that PiS is bad, and PO is progressive liberal party, and their friends are voting on SLD/PO too. I've read some books about backstage of political scene, about our politicians and their behaviour in 80.-90. and I will never vote on those liars and thiefs from PO/SLD/PSL/etc. They are responsible for the event that harmed our economy - recall of Olszewski goverment in 1992. Raw facts can be seen in document called Nocna Zmiana. Here they are - stars! Tusk, Kwaśniewski, Lis... and the biggest scum: Wałęsa.

PiS is the best goverment that we could cave since 1989, but commercial media are showing it as the worse goverment. Naive people belive everything what is said in TV or written in Michnik's "Gazeta Wyborcza" paper. There is one independent paper - "Gazeta Polska", but it is under Michnik's attack. He is a progressive postcommunist with cash, and "GW" non-stop bring ridiculous actions against "GP", and "GP" must pay for the case. "GP" will go bankrupt soon... Michnik has also influence and "resources" that allows him to create image of Poland abroad. Anti-PiS net spreads over most of UE countries, and left wing has the most power in Union. UE is not community of countries, but the community of interests, sometimes similiar to soviet union. They hate our goverment, because we aren't agreeing with everything that left wing say (options really bad for Poland!).

Now PiS is forced by opposition to carry out an early election. But I hope citizens of Poland aren't mindless blinds, and I hope they won't vote on communist-firendly parties (opposition). But that's only my hope... Few years ago, when SLD was main party in goverment, I was thinking only about departure. Now, when there is hope PiS put their laws into force, I consider starting software developement activity in Poland. But this is only thought, PiS don't have chance to realise plans (good plans for Poland, but media won't say that - if they say, that will mean defeat of the opposition). The main mistake of PiS was alliance with Rydzyk. PiS hoped that Rydzyk will bring electors and he did, but they propably lost more other electors because of this move. Now Rydzyk's tapes where Rydzyk offends Kaczyński are revealed, and opposition make use of it. They defend the president. Why? It's obvious - they want make mischief between PiS and Rydzyk while he unfortunately is main source of ruling party electors...

Sorry for my english but I'm not good at it...

deviantID

No deviantID yet.

Devious Info

No devious info yet.

deviantART Notice

[x]

Comments


used your stock here: [link]

thank you!:heart:

--
Childhood is the kingdom where nobody dies :heart:

[i'm a slow dying flower] :butterflytwo:
Hi there, I used your stock here: [link] Thank you very much! :)
Hello! :wave:
I hope you are doing well!
I just wanted to let you know that I used your wood texture for the floor in one of my new artworks which you may view here =>[link]

I hope you like it! :hug:

--
Dee :flirty:

:sun: :sun: :sun:
Hi, great textures! Cheers...

--
"if you enjoy my work tell to the others, if not tell to me"
Used your concrete wall here-->[link]

Delightful, thanks :thanks:
Wonderful textures, just keep up the talent bro :thumbsup:

--
*Don't forget Islam, the religion of 100% truth and success*
Used your stock on [link] Thanks! :hug:
Hey there.
Random deviant. If you read this can you please help me out.
i have a research assignment where i am trying to find what common things influence peoples music choices.
Can you please copy and paste this in to a reply and add your answers. i really need some info. please.

NOTE all questions are NOT compulsory so if your unsure or dont want to answer one thats fine.

1. Gender

2. Where do you live?

3. Ethnicity?

4. Age?

5. Religion?

6. delete the ones that dont apply to you. add others if you can think of any.
What genre/s of music do you prefer?
jazz, blues, punk, emo, ballads, funk, soft rock, rock, pop, heavy metal, disco, country, r&b, dance, soul, hip hop, rap, orchestral, classical, acoustic, power metal, indie, hardcore, ska, electronica.

7. What era of music do you prefer to listen too? Same rules as Q.6
pre 1950's, 50's, 60's, 70's, 80's, 90's, 00's, Top 40 (current charts).

8. do you prefer bands, solo artists or groups?

9. do you prefer male or female vocals?

10. where do you listen to your music (delete those innapropriate, add others)
Home, Work, Car, Pub/Club, Ipod, School.

11. Who/what influences your choices of music (delete/add)
Parents, Friends, TV, Radio, Magazines, Newspapers, Internet, Movies, Videogames.

12. How do you prefer to purchase your music?

13. on average, in a montyh, how many cd's would you:
Buy?
Burn?

14. How many cd's would you own (nearest 10)

Thats all.
If you could reply this back to me it would be greatly appreciated.
Tara

--
drink, eat and be drunk and fat.

click on the [link]
come on... you know you want to
hey. used you stock in a website interface design. heres the link so you can see...[link]
i linked it back to your home page so your credited. let me know if you want the link changed.
thankyou for the stock by the way.

--
drink, eat and be drunk and fat.

click on the [link]
come on... you know you want to

Site Map